Part of the Georgia Performance Standards for Environmental Science are listed below.
Students will investigate the flow of energy and cycling of matter within an ecosystem
and relate these phenomena to human society.
b. Relate energy changes to food chains, food webs, and to trophic levels in a
generalized ecosystem, recognizing that entropy is a primary factor in the loss of
usable food energy during movement up the trophic levels.
c. Relate food production and quality of nutrition to population growth and the trophic
levels.
d. Relate the cycling of matter and the flow of energy to the Laws of Conservation of
matter and energy. Identify the role and importance of decomposers in the recycling
process.
To assess students over these standards, they will complete the following assignment.
Students will create a Prezi presentation showing three different food chains in the local ecosystem and a food web showing how the food chains are interconnected. Then the students will answer the following questions.
1. As you go up a food chain, what happens to the amount of energy available for use? Explain why this is in using the laws of thermodynamics.
2. As human population grows, the world will need more food to provide nutrition for the growing population. Explain how people may be able to meet the nutritional demands of the future by changing the trophic level of humans.
3. What role do decomposers play in your food chain or food web?
I developed a quick rubric for scoring the assignment using Anneberg Learner Rubric Builder.
Rubric
Again, I am amazed at how remarkably well the general criteria fit my specific assignment. I could use this rubric to grade the assignment as is. However, for the students to get the fullest from my feedback, I'd have to make personal comments to go along with the rubric.
Lets say a student completed the assignment, made his Prezi, and answered his questions in complete sentences in paragraph format. But let's say that his food chains only had three levels each and when made into a food web, there were only one or two connections between food chains. He answered question one by saying "The amount of energy available for use as you go up trophic levels goes down," but he goes no further. He answered question two by saying "In the future people can eat less." He answered question three, "Decomposers break down dead material and return nutrients to a usable form in soil or air."
For format, I'd score him strong - a 4. He completed a Prezi, made his food chains and food web, and answered the questions in complete sentences.
For organization, I'd score him basic - a 2. If I just sent him that though, he'd not know what he failed to do. So I'd send him personal feedback something like this.
"You connected the ideas of food chains to food webs. However, by limiting your food chains to only three levels, you fail to grasp the complexity of food chains and food webs. Such a short food chain led to few connections within your food web. Thus, it appears that food webs and food chains are only partly connected when in fact their are many, complex connections between the two. Moreover, your answers the the questions are at best, partly correct. They are often incomplete. For example, you correctly state that energy for use goes down as you go up tropic levels but you did not explain "why" using the laws of thermodynamics.
On content, I'd again score him a 2 - basic. I'd point out that he did the minimum to meet the assignment by completing three food chains but the food chains really weren't complete as many links were left out of the chain. Showing only three trophic levels skips many levels of consumers.
On details, I'd score him weak - a 1. I'd again point out the lack of depth in his food chains and food webs. I'd point out the incompleteness of his answers to the questions. I would however give a little praise for encouragement by telling him that his answer to question three shows a better depth of knowledge, but I'd leave him with a question. "What do decomposers have to do with energy transfer?"